William A. Dombi, Director of the National Association for Home Care's Center for Health Care Law, today took issue with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) assertion that the Medicare home health benefit will grow at a rate of 42 percent this year as counter to the evidence and experience reported by home care professionals, administrators, and state home care associations." Dombi offered the following analysis:
With respect to growth rates, the Office of the Actuary at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (the agency at HHS that administers the Medicare program) and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) have projected that, between FY2001 and FY2002, home health outlays will grow by approximately 42 percent, from $9.3 billion to $13.2 billion. (The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects home health spending for FY2002 will be $11.4 billion, not $13.2 billion.) The NAHC analysis of the 40+percent growth figure shows that:
In short, most of the growth projected for the home health program is based
on guesses. Given the difficulty that both CBO and the Centers for Medicare
and Medicaid Services (CMS) have had over the last five years in accurately
predicting Medicare outlays for home health, and their tendency to overstate
expected outlays as part of their projections, the current data should be viewed
with great suspicion. For example, CBO projected the Balanced Budget Act of
1997 (BBA97) cuts to yield about $16 billion from home health over five years;
instead, it is expected that more than $72 billion will be cut over the same
time period. Further, in February 2001, CMS projected home health outlays for
FY2001 to be $10.3 billion. In July 2001, that estimate was reduced to $9.6
billion. Today the CBO estimate for FY2001 is $9.1 billion. That's over a $1
billion drop in estimated outlays in less than one year's time. Most astonishingly,
CBO projects expenditures to reach $45 billion by 2012 while CMS projections
are set nearly $20 billion lower at $25.5 billion.
OMB and HHS have also asserted that the 15 percent cut scheduled for October
1, 2002, is actually a 7 percent cut. They overlook the fact that the BBA97
mandated a 15 percent cut in the per beneficiary and per visit limits as home
health transitioned to the new prospective payment system. If the actual cut
in payments for FY2003 should turn out to be less than 15 percent, it will be
because home health agencies were very cautious in the last year of the preceding
interim payment system and incurred average costs significantly below allowable
levels. In effect, this means that a portion of the 15 percent cut has already
been implemented, through the careful stewardship of home health agencies. As
a result of the fiscally responsible behavior of home health agencies, the initial
PPS payment rates were set at 12 percent below the average estimated costs.
As such, if implemented, the net impact of the 15 percent cut will
be closer to 20 percent (12 percent from the initial PPS payment rate setting
and an additional 7 to 8 percent in October 2002).
NAHC does not dispute that some growth is projected in the Medicare home health benefit. This growth reflects some of the effects of the change to a new payment system, the temporary 10 percent add-on for care provided to rural patients, and modest recovery from the drastic cuts of BBA97 that has been long in coming. Yet, even with this projected growth, expected expenditures are far below what was projected for the home care benefit in the 1990s. In 1997 CBO projected that home health spending for FY 2002 would be reduced as a result of BBA97 from $29.9 billion to $25.2 billion. CBO now projects that spending for FY2002 will be reduced to $11.4 billion. (March 2002 CBO Report.) Even in the unlikely event that CMS's estimate of $13.2 billion for FY2002 should turn out to be accurate, home health spending for FY 2002 will have been cut in half.
Moreover, factors indicate that growth in the benefit will not keep pace with need. There are no indications that new providers are entering the program, that there is a decrease in patient care needs, or that unmet needs are now being addressed. For the first time in the history of Medicare, spending on nursing homes is outpacing home health spending. This despite the growing preference by patients for care in a non-institutional setting. The bottom line is that home care cannot withstand additional cuts of any magnitude.
Founded in 1982, NAHC is the largest trade association serving the nation's home care agencies, hospices, and home care aide organizations. Home care and hospice services help keep families together by providing vitally needed healthcare and supportive services to millions of Americans each year in the dignity of their own homes.
###