Skip to Main Content
National Association for Home Care & Hospice
Twitter Facebook Pintrest


In the various roles he has undertaken through the years, Val J. Halamandaris has been a singular driving force behind the policy and program initiatives resulting in the recognition of home health care as a viable alternative to institutionalization. His dedication to consumer advocacy, which enhances the quality of life and dignity of those receiving home health care, merits VNA HealthCare Group’s highest recognition and deepest respect. 

VNA HealthCare Group

I have the highest respect for them, especially for the nurses, aides and therapists, who devote their lives to caring for people with disabilities, the infirm and dying Americans.  There are few more noble professions.

President Barack Obama

Home health care agencies do such a wonderful job in this country helping people to be able to remain at home and allowing them to receive services

U.S. Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) Chair, Democratic Steering and Outreach Committee

Home care is a combination of compassion and efficiency.  It is less expensive than institutional care...but at the same time it is a more caring, human, intimate experience, and therefore it has a greater human’s a big mistake not to try to maximize it and find ways to give people the home care option over either nursing homes, hospitals or other institutions

Former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives Newt Gingrich (R-GA)

Medicaid covers long-term care, but only for low-income families.  And Medicare only pays for care that is connected to a hospital discharge....our health care system must cover these vital services...[and] we should promote home-based care, which most people prefer, instead of the institutional care that we emphasize now.

Former U.S. Senator Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-CD)

We need incentives to...keep people in home health care settings...It’s dramatically less expensive than long term care.

U.S. Senator John McCain (R-AZ)


Home care is clearly the wave of the future. It’s clearly where patients want to be cared for. I come from an ethnic family and when a member of our family is severely ill, we would never consider taking them to get institutional care. That’s true of many families for both cultural and financial reasons. If patients have a choice of where they want to be cared for, where it’s done the right way, they choose home.

Donna Shalala, former Secretary of Health and Human Services

A couple of years ago, I spent a little bit of time with the National Association for Home Care & Hospice and its president, Val J. Halamandaris, and I was just blown away. What impressed me so much was that they talked about what they do as opposed to just the strategies of how to deal with Washington or Sacramento or Albany or whatever the case may be. Val is a fanatic about care, and it comes through in every way known to mankind. It comes through in the speakers he invites to their events; it comes through in all the stuff he shares.

Tom Peters, author of In Search of Excellence

Val’s home care organization brings thousands of caregivers together into a dynamic organization that provides them with valuable resources and tools to be even better in their important work. He helps them build self-esteem, which leads to self-motivation.

Mike Vance, former Dean of Disney and author of Think Out of the Box

Val is one of the greatest advocates for seniors in America. He goes beyond the call of duty every time.

Arthur S. Flemming, former Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare

Val has brought the problems, the challenges, and the opportunities out in the open for everyone to look at. He is a visionary pointing the direction for us. 

Margaret (Peg) Cushman, Professor of Nursing and former President of the Visiting Nurses Association

Although Val has chosen to stay in the background, he deserves much of the credit for what was accomplished both at the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging, where he was closely associated with me and at the House Select Committee on Aging, where he was Congressman Claude Pepper’s senior counsel and closest advisor. He put together more hearings on the subject of aging, wrote more reports, drafted more bills, and had more influence on the direction of events than anyone before him or since.

Frank E. Moss, former U.S. Senator

Val’s most important contribution is pulling together all elements of home health care and being able to organize and energize the people involved in the industry.

Frank E. Moss, former U.S. Senator

Anyone working on health care issues in Congress knows the name Val J. Halamandaris.

Kathleen Gardner Cravedi, former Staff Director of the House Select Committee on Aging

Without your untiring support and active participation, the voices of people advocating meaningful and compassionate health care reform may not have been heard by national leaders.

Michael Sullivan, Former Executive Director, Indiana Association for Home Care

All of us have been members of many organizations and NAHC is simply the best there is. NAHC aspires to excellence in every respect; its staff has been repeatedly honored as the best in Washington; the organization lives by the highest values and has demonstrated a passionate interest in the well-being of patients and providers.

Elaine Stephens, Director of Home Care of Steward Home Care/Steward Health Systems and former NAHC C

Home care increasingly is one of the basic building blocks in the developing system of long-term care.  On both economic and recuperative bases, home health care will continue to grow as an essential service for individuals, for families and for the community as a whole.

Former U.S. Senator Olympia Snowe (R-ME)

NCOA is excited to be part of this great event and honored to have such influential award winners in the field of aging.

National Council of Aging

Health care at home…is something we need more of, not less of.  Let us make a commitment to preventive and long-term care.  Let us encourage home care as an alternative to nursing homes and give folks a little help to have their parents there.

Former President Bill Clinton

Home Health Copays, Other Recommendations Included in MedPAC’s 2013 Report to Congress

April 3, 2013 04:36 PM

The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) recently released its annual report to Congress. In the report, MedPAC makes the same recommendations in 2013 as it did in 2012 regarding home health services. MedPAC based this decision on its belief that access to home health care is adequate, quality continues to improve, access to capitol is sufficient, and profit margins remain high.  MedPAC pointed to the growth in the number of home health agencies - over 700 new agencies in 2011 - totaling 12,199 as evidence of access. Regarding profit margins, despite a 5 percent reduction in total payments and a leveling of service volume, average profit margins in 2011 equaled 14.8 percent for freestanding agencies.

The MedPAC recommendations to Congress in 2013 continue to be: 

  1. The Secretary, with the Office of Inspector General, should conduct medical review activities in counties that have aberrant home health utilization. The Secretary should implement the new authorities to suspend payment and the enrollment of new providers if they indicate significant fraud.
  2. Congress should direct the Secretary to begin a two-year rebasing of home health rates in 2013 and eliminate the market basket update for 2012.
  3. The Secretary should revise the home health case-mix system to rely on patient characteristics to set payment for therapy and non-therapy services, and should no longer use the number of therapy visits as a payment factor.
  4. The Congress should direct the Secretary to establish a per-episode copay for home health episodes that are not preceded by hospitalization or post-acute care use.

Control of Growth in Use

MedPAC asserts that the high profit margins in home health – an average 17.7 percent between 2001 and 2010 - “have likely encouraged the entry of new HHAs.” They based their first recommendation on the opinion that, although CMS has improved screening procedures for new entrants, many areas of the country with fraud concerns have an overabundance of agencies. 

Recent reviews by the Office of Inspector General suggest that there are aberrant utilization practices in these geographic regions. In addition to increased medical review in these areas, MedPAC recommended the implementation of temporary moratoriums on enrollment of new agencies. NAHC has long supported these recommendations.

MedPAC acknowledged that there was a lack of growth in the number of episodes in 2011. They attribute some of this lack of growth in home health to the Face-to-Face encounter requirement that went into effect the same year, and which may have resulted in fewer referrals to home health agencies. 

Claims data for 2011 suggest that new therapy reassessment requirements served as a deterrent to what MedPAC describes as manipulation of services to increase payment. According to 2011 claims data, the number of episodes with visits at and beyond the fourteenth and twentieth visit therapy thresholds decreased relative to 2010 after implementation of reassessment requirements. For example, the number of episodes with 14 - 19 therapy visits decreased by 9.5 percent and the number of episodes with more than 20 therapy visits decreased by 9.2 percent. The Report further points to a large jump in episodes with six to 13 therapy visits - the possible cause being the lack of reassessment requirements for this visit range.

NAHC believes that the decline in episodes reaching the fourteenth and twentieth therapy visit threshold, and growth in episodes in the 6-13 therapy visit range, are due in part to the increased number of non-covered visits caused by reassessment scheduling difficulties in multiple therapy cases. MedPAC did not acknowledge this factor in its report.

Despite the reduction in therapy services, MedPAC continues to assert that Medicare should revise the case-mix system and therapy utilization eliminated as a determinant of payment.   

Long-Term Care Patients

In a different section of the report, MedPAC implies that home health services are being inappropriately used to care for persons with long-term care needs. According to the Report, there has been a shift from services to persons after an acute care stay to services to persons referred from the community. According to MedPAC, community referred patients have fewer chronic conditions than post-acute, comprise a higher number of dual-eligibles, have a higher incidence of Alzheimer disease, receive more episodes of care and higher levels of home health aide services. MedPAC purports that due to the availability of home health services, “broad coverage permits beneficiaries to receive services in the home when they are capable of leaving home for medical care.”

Over the years, NAHC has repeatedly emphasized to MedPAC that the Medicare statute and regulations support the provision of unlimited home health services to eligible beneficiaries - i.e. homebound persons in need of skilled medically necessary nursing or therapy - regardless of whether their conditions are acute, chronic, long term, or terminal.

MedPAC’s recommendation is to establish a Medicare home health copay that would be applicable to episodes of care not preceded by an acute care stay as a means to decrease home health utilization by individuals referred from the community. NAHC opposes such copays – regarding them as a “sick tax” on home care and a barrier to access.

Accelerated Rebasing

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) requires the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to reduce base rates for providers over a four-year period beginning in 2014 with a maximum reduction of 3.5 percent a year. The reduction may be offset by payment updates. MedPAC recommended a more rigorous application of rebasing to home health, calling for rebasing of home health payments over a two-year period with elimination of payment updates as a means to bring payments in line with costs more quickly.

Despite MedPAC's issuance of these rebasing recommendations, CMS will likely be unable to accelerate rebasing for home health. 

Rural Adjustments

In its discussion of services to persons in rural areas, the Report maintains that there is a high level of utilization in many rural areas. According to MedPAC, this may be due to “a maldistribution of the add-on payments Medicare makes for rural home health services.” According to the Report, rural areas generally had utilization similar to that in urban areas in 2008. However, frontier counties - those that average six or fewer individuals per square mile - had significantly lower utilization. In 2008, beneficiaries residing in frontier counties averaged about half the number of home health episodes as in other rural areas.

MedPAC noted that the rural add-on as it now exists does nothing to improve access to care in frontier areas and that Medicare should target payment adjustments for rural areas to those areas that have access challenges, rather than for all rural areas. 

The full MedPAC Report can be read here.




©  National Association for Home Care & Hospice. All Rights Reserved.