Skip to Main Content
National Association for Home Care & Hospice
Twitter Facebook Pintrest


In the various roles he has undertaken through the years, Val J. Halamandaris has been a singular driving force behind the policy and program initiatives resulting in the recognition of home health care as a viable alternative to institutionalization. His dedication to consumer advocacy, which enhances the quality of life and dignity of those receiving home health care, merits VNA HealthCare Group’s highest recognition and deepest respect. 

VNA HealthCare Group

I have the highest respect for them, especially for the nurses, aides and therapists, who devote their lives to caring for people with disabilities, the infirm and dying Americans.  There are few more noble professions.

President Barack Obama

Home health care agencies do such a wonderful job in this country helping people to be able to remain at home and allowing them to receive services

U.S. Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) Chair, Democratic Steering and Outreach Committee

Home care is a combination of compassion and efficiency.  It is less expensive than institutional care...but at the same time it is a more caring, human, intimate experience, and therefore it has a greater human’s a big mistake not to try to maximize it and find ways to give people the home care option over either nursing homes, hospitals or other institutions

Former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives Newt Gingrich (R-GA)

Medicaid covers long-term care, but only for low-income families.  And Medicare only pays for care that is connected to a hospital discharge....our health care system must cover these vital services...[and] we should promote home-based care, which most people prefer, instead of the institutional care that we emphasize now.

Former U.S. Senator Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-CD)

We need incentives to...keep people in home health care settings...It’s dramatically less expensive than long term care.

U.S. Senator John McCain (R-AZ)


Home care is clearly the wave of the future. It’s clearly where patients want to be cared for. I come from an ethnic family and when a member of our family is severely ill, we would never consider taking them to get institutional care. That’s true of many families for both cultural and financial reasons. If patients have a choice of where they want to be cared for, where it’s done the right way, they choose home.

Donna Shalala, former Secretary of Health and Human Services

A couple of years ago, I spent a little bit of time with the National Association for Home Care & Hospice and its president, Val J. Halamandaris, and I was just blown away. What impressed me so much was that they talked about what they do as opposed to just the strategies of how to deal with Washington or Sacramento or Albany or whatever the case may be. Val is a fanatic about care, and it comes through in every way known to mankind. It comes through in the speakers he invites to their events; it comes through in all the stuff he shares.

Tom Peters, author of In Search of Excellence

Val’s home care organization brings thousands of caregivers together into a dynamic organization that provides them with valuable resources and tools to be even better in their important work. He helps them build self-esteem, which leads to self-motivation.

Mike Vance, former Dean of Disney and author of Think Out of the Box

Val is one of the greatest advocates for seniors in America. He goes beyond the call of duty every time.

Arthur S. Flemming, former Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare

Val has brought the problems, the challenges, and the opportunities out in the open for everyone to look at. He is a visionary pointing the direction for us. 

Margaret (Peg) Cushman, Professor of Nursing and former President of the Visiting Nurses Association

Although Val has chosen to stay in the background, he deserves much of the credit for what was accomplished both at the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging, where he was closely associated with me and at the House Select Committee on Aging, where he was Congressman Claude Pepper’s senior counsel and closest advisor. He put together more hearings on the subject of aging, wrote more reports, drafted more bills, and had more influence on the direction of events than anyone before him or since.

Frank E. Moss, former U.S. Senator

Val’s most important contribution is pulling together all elements of home health care and being able to organize and energize the people involved in the industry.

Frank E. Moss, former U.S. Senator

Anyone working on health care issues in Congress knows the name Val J. Halamandaris.

Kathleen Gardner Cravedi, former Staff Director of the House Select Committee on Aging

Without your untiring support and active participation, the voices of people advocating meaningful and compassionate health care reform may not have been heard by national leaders.

Michael Sullivan, Former Executive Director, Indiana Association for Home Care

All of us have been members of many organizations and NAHC is simply the best there is. NAHC aspires to excellence in every respect; its staff has been repeatedly honored as the best in Washington; the organization lives by the highest values and has demonstrated a passionate interest in the well-being of patients and providers.

Elaine Stephens, Director of Home Care of Steward Home Care/Steward Health Systems and former NAHC C

Home care increasingly is one of the basic building blocks in the developing system of long-term care.  On both economic and recuperative bases, home health care will continue to grow as an essential service for individuals, for families and for the community as a whole.

Former U.S. Senator Olympia Snowe (R-ME)

NCOA is excited to be part of this great event and honored to have such influential award winners in the field of aging.

National Council of Aging

Health care at home…is something we need more of, not less of.  Let us make a commitment to preventive and long-term care.  Let us encourage home care as an alternative to nursing homes and give folks a little help to have their parents there.

Former President Bill Clinton

Illinois Court Grants Nine Children Denied HCBS Class Action Status

February 26, 2014 09:26 AM

On February 13, in N.B., et al., v. Hamos, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (the Court) granted class action status to nine children (the Plaintiffs) with behavioral or emotional disorders who were denied home and community-based services (HCBS). This follows an October 2011 Amended Complaint (the Amended Complaint) by the Plaintiffs, as well as a December 2013 Memorandum Opinion and Order, whereby the judge refused the defendant Illinois Department of Human Services (DHS)’s motion to dismiss the case. 


Severe Shortage of HCBS. The Amended Complaint references three reports showing a severe shortage of HCBS in Illinois (the State). The first was a report written by DHS in March 2010. This report stated that in Fiscal Year 2009, while DHS found that over 18,000 individuals aged 21 and younger had severe mental illnesses and emotional disturbances (MI/SED), only 220 received intensive community based services. Out of those 220, 145 received in-home services through the Individual Care Grant (ICG) Program, and 75 received services through Child Group Homes.

The second report cited by the Amended Complaint was the DHS Community Services Act Report from January 2009. According to that report, in Fiscal Year 2007, the ICG program only issued 81 grants out of a total 1,051 requests to receive intensive community based services.

The third report was issued by DHS in May 2011. It found that 496 children had an “Emergency Need” for “in-home or day supports immediately due to the person’s serious health or behavioral issues” and an additional 1,627 having a “Critical Need” for additional community supports.

Unnecessary institutionalization, poor care. Because of the lack of HCBS, the Amended Complaint asserted that those in the State with behavioral and emotional disorders are forced to “cycle through hospitals, emergency rooms, acute care facilities, and residential treatment centers without obtaining any long-term relief.” The Amended Complaint also alleges that “[t]he State of Illinois system of mental health care is so weak and uncoordinated that most children are released from facilities with little or ineffective follow-up community mental health care.”


The Plaintiffs allege the following:

Denial of medically necessary services. The Plaintiffs are entitled to receive Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic, and Treatment Services (EPSDT) under Illinois’ Healthy Kids Program. According to the February Order, the children are entitled to periodic health screenings, which “’must include’…a Mental Health Assessment” whereby a Licensed Practitioner of the Healing Arts (LPHA) determines that a child “needs” a specific service to “‘stabilize the client’s functioning, or to restore or rehabilitate the client to a maximum level of life functioning,’ or that could not be omitted from a treatment plan ‘without adversely affecting the client’s level of functioning’ across ‘critical life areas.’”

Therefore, as the Amended Complaint alleges, the Plaintiffs are “entitled to receive…medically necessary services in the community [through EPSDT].” Although mental health experts recommended that these children needed EPSDT and HCBS, Illinois never granted them such services.

Unnecessary institutionalization. According to the Amended Complaint, as the Plaintiffs were denied EPSDT and HCBS services, they faced “unnecessary institutionalization,” or imminent threat thereof.  The Amended Complaint asserted that “the Defendant offers only a negligible amount of intensive home and community-based services to some children and not all children and have chosen instead to serve children in needlessly segregated settings.”

Relief Requested

The Plaintiffs brought their suit against DHS on four grounds, including that the defendant violated: the EPSDT provisions of the Social Security Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and the Rehabilitation Act. The Plaintiffs seek relief that, according to the February Order, “would require [DHS] to implement appropriate screening and treatment alternatives to the acute care provided in general and psychiatric hospitals.” In addition, plaintiff N.B. seeks monetary damages for defendant’s alleged violation of the Rehabilitation Act. 

To see the Amended Complaint, click here.  

Class Certified

In the February Order, the Court certified the class to be defined as follows:

All Medicaid-eligible children under the age of 21 in the State of Illinois: (1) who have been diagnosed with a mental health or behavioral disorder; and (2) for whom a licensed practitioner of the healing arts has recommended intensive home- and community-based services to correct or ameliorate their disorders. [Feb 2013 Order, p. 30].

To see the February Order, click here.  


Undermining rebalancing.The National Council on Medicaid Home Care – a NAHC affiliate - continues to oppose policies of states that have the effect of hindering rebalancing. By cutting needed benefits, the State creates an increased risk that severely developmentally disabled people like the Plaintiffs will be hospitalized or institutionalized.

The facts alleged in the Amended Complaint support the conclusion made in Senator Harkin’s Report that the victory of Olmstead, a case brought against the state of Georgia fifteen years ago, is incomplete. Home care providers should be aware that despite large national strides towards rebalancing, there is still unmet demand for home and community-based services (HCBS) caused by such short-sighted policies as alleged in recent litigation in Illinois (as described herein), New Mexico, and Florida, and demonstrated in New Hampshire and Georgia. As the Department of Justice suggested in the Florida case, states can adjust to this demand through cost-effective, “reasonable modifications,” such as providing more HCBS options/funding and pro-active HCBS screenings.

Compared to other states, Illinois uses long-term services and supports (LTSS) with mixed results. While AARP claims the State spent 27.9% of its Medicaid and state funded LTSS in HCBS, ranking it 30th among the states for that metric, AARP still ranked the State 23rd overall in LTSS utilization in its 2011 scorecard. While obtaining high marks in affordability and access LTSS metrics (12th overall), the State scored low marks in support for family caregivers (27th overall) and choice of setting & provider (33rd overall) LTSS metrics. 

The Council encourages providers to continue to advocate for greater support of HCBS through their state associations, as well as through state and federal governments. Home care providers are encouraged to keep abreast of HCBS developments in their states, and nationally, and to contact the Council with any questions or concerns.




©  National Association for Home Care & Hospice. All Rights Reserved.