Skip to Main Content
National Association for Home Care & Hospice
Twitter Facebook Pintrest


In the various roles he has undertaken through the years, Val J. Halamandaris has been a singular driving force behind the policy and program initiatives resulting in the recognition of home health care as a viable alternative to institutionalization. His dedication to consumer advocacy, which enhances the quality of life and dignity of those receiving home health care, merits VNA HealthCare Group’s highest recognition and deepest respect. 

VNA HealthCare Group

I have the highest respect for them, especially for the nurses, aides and therapists, who devote their lives to caring for people with disabilities, the infirm and dying Americans.  There are few more noble professions.

President Barack Obama

Home health care agencies do such a wonderful job in this country helping people to be able to remain at home and allowing them to receive services

U.S. Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) Chair, Democratic Steering and Outreach Committee

Home care is a combination of compassion and efficiency.  It is less expensive than institutional care...but at the same time it is a more caring, human, intimate experience, and therefore it has a greater human’s a big mistake not to try to maximize it and find ways to give people the home care option over either nursing homes, hospitals or other institutions

Former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives Newt Gingrich (R-GA)

Medicaid covers long-term care, but only for low-income families.  And Medicare only pays for care that is connected to a hospital discharge....our health care system must cover these vital services...[and] we should promote home-based care, which most people prefer, instead of the institutional care that we emphasize now.

Former U.S. Senator Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-CD)

We need incentives to...keep people in home health care settings...It’s dramatically less expensive than long term care.

U.S. Senator John McCain (R-AZ)


Home care is clearly the wave of the future. It’s clearly where patients want to be cared for. I come from an ethnic family and when a member of our family is severely ill, we would never consider taking them to get institutional care. That’s true of many families for both cultural and financial reasons. If patients have a choice of where they want to be cared for, where it’s done the right way, they choose home.

Donna Shalala, former Secretary of Health and Human Services

A couple of years ago, I spent a little bit of time with the National Association for Home Care & Hospice and its president, Val J. Halamandaris, and I was just blown away. What impressed me so much was that they talked about what they do as opposed to just the strategies of how to deal with Washington or Sacramento or Albany or whatever the case may be. Val is a fanatic about care, and it comes through in every way known to mankind. It comes through in the speakers he invites to their events; it comes through in all the stuff he shares.

Tom Peters, author of In Search of Excellence

Val’s home care organization brings thousands of caregivers together into a dynamic organization that provides them with valuable resources and tools to be even better in their important work. He helps them build self-esteem, which leads to self-motivation.

Mike Vance, former Dean of Disney and author of Think Out of the Box

Val is one of the greatest advocates for seniors in America. He goes beyond the call of duty every time.

Arthur S. Flemming, former Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare

Val has brought the problems, the challenges, and the opportunities out in the open for everyone to look at. He is a visionary pointing the direction for us. 

Margaret (Peg) Cushman, Professor of Nursing and former President of the Visiting Nurses Association

Although Val has chosen to stay in the background, he deserves much of the credit for what was accomplished both at the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging, where he was closely associated with me and at the House Select Committee on Aging, where he was Congressman Claude Pepper’s senior counsel and closest advisor. He put together more hearings on the subject of aging, wrote more reports, drafted more bills, and had more influence on the direction of events than anyone before him or since.

Frank E. Moss, former U.S. Senator

Val’s most important contribution is pulling together all elements of home health care and being able to organize and energize the people involved in the industry.

Frank E. Moss, former U.S. Senator

Anyone working on health care issues in Congress knows the name Val J. Halamandaris.

Kathleen Gardner Cravedi, former Staff Director of the House Select Committee on Aging

Without your untiring support and active participation, the voices of people advocating meaningful and compassionate health care reform may not have been heard by national leaders.

Michael Sullivan, Former Executive Director, Indiana Association for Home Care

All of us have been members of many organizations and NAHC is simply the best there is. NAHC aspires to excellence in every respect; its staff has been repeatedly honored as the best in Washington; the organization lives by the highest values and has demonstrated a passionate interest in the well-being of patients and providers.

Elaine Stephens, Director of Home Care of Steward Home Care/Steward Health Systems and former NAHC C

Home care increasingly is one of the basic building blocks in the developing system of long-term care.  On both economic and recuperative bases, home health care will continue to grow as an essential service for individuals, for families and for the community as a whole.

Former U.S. Senator Olympia Snowe (R-ME)

NCOA is excited to be part of this great event and honored to have such influential award winners in the field of aging.

National Council of Aging

Health care at home…is something we need more of, not less of.  Let us make a commitment to preventive and long-term care.  Let us encourage home care as an alternative to nursing homes and give folks a little help to have their parents there.

Former President Bill Clinton

Medicare Claims Audits Focus on OASIS Submissions: A Guide to Responding to Denials

June 27, 2014 09:01 AM

The Medicare Supplemental Medical Review Contractor, SHS, has initiated audits of home health agencies in New England states with a focus on OASIS submissions in 2010. The audits were triggered by a recent OIG study that found a high incidence of Medicare paid claims where the home health agency did not have an accepted OASIS prior to the date of billing. Beginning in 2010, OASIS submission became a condition of payment for home health services under federal regulations at 42 CFR 484.55. While the rule references OASIS submissions, CMS has applied the rule to require the acceptance of an OASIS prior to billing as a payment requirement.

Until recently, the OASIS submission/acceptance condition of payment has not been audited or enforced. An OIG report highlighted this as a risk area for HHAs. Generally, an HHA will submit a batch of OASIS shortly after the start of episodes of care. The OASIS validation report then provides the HHA with a HIPPS code for billing purposes. In most circumstances, that OASIS report will be received prior to billing of the final claim on the episode. In the event that the OASIS submission is rejected, the HHA will be so informed and a corrected OASIS submission will occur. However, in some instances the HHA bills Medicare prior to the submission and acceptance of a compliant OASIS. In these circumstances, the HHA runs the risk of a claim denial based on the untimely (premature) billing.

CMS has planned to establish systems to reject premature billings automatically. Such would take a coordination of the OASIS database maintained by the state survey agencies with the claims database maintained by the MACs. That system does not yet exist. In the meantime, HHAs must maintain internal systems that ensure that no claims are billed until there I s a validated receipt of the OASIS submission. Further, HHAs must ensure that the claim HIPPS code is consistent with the OASIS validated HIPPS code.

NAHC contacted CMS officials to discuss the validity and appropriateness of these audits. CMS officials were unaware of the actions of SHS and have initiated an investigation. A CMS official explained that SHS has a "scope of work" with CMS that allows SHS to conduct claims reviews whenever the review target issue has been considered a program integrity weakness or vulnerability by the OIG without requiring specific project approval by CMS.

NAHC informed CMS of concerns that the audit included the re opening of claims that were 3-4 years past payment and that HHAs are not required to retain OASIS validation reports. CMS itself does not retain the validation reports beyond one year. In the audits, HHAs are experiencing retroactive claims denials because they cannot produce the evidence necessary to demonstrate compliance.

NAHC further explained that the extended delay in claim re opening prevents HHAs from correcting any non compliant billings even though CMS intended to allow providers the opportunity to do such where the OASIS submission was flawed and corrected submissions were made.

CMS officials will be providing NAHC with a progress report on their investigation by the end of the week.

What should audited HHAs do at this point?

HHAs subject to this OASIS audit should consider the following steps:

1. During the audit, the HHA should demand that SHS produce the evidence to prove that the submitted OASIS was not accepted on or before the date that the HHA billed Medicare. With the state of the availability of the validation reports, the burden to prove noncompliance should rest with the auditor. Requiring an HHA to produce a validation report that CMS did not retain itself nor require the HHA to retain should shift the burden of proff to the auditor.

2. The HHA should protest that the audit is an illegal and invalid re opening of claims in violation of 42 CFR 405.980. Under that rule, claims can be reopened after payment only if "good cause" is established when the reopening is more than 1 year and less than 4 years since payment. After 4 years, the rule requires Medicare to demonstrate that there is "fraud or similar fault" to justify an extended authority to reopen.

With the OASIS audits, the "good cause" and "fraud or similar fault" standards cannot be met. CMS was fully capable of identifying noncompliant claims on or about the day the claims were filed. CMS had full control of OASIS data submissions as well as the claims. The reopening limitations are intended to protect providers from unnecessary retroactive claim denials and to prevent CMS from administration of claims reviews in a manner that encourages or rewards procrastination. The reopening restrictions are the equivalent of a statute of limitations, providing HHAs with the security of knowing when they are safe from arbitrary reviews.

3. The purpose of the OASIS submission requirement as a condition of payment is to provide a means to ensure that the HIPPs code used for billing is consistent with the OASIS submitted HIPPS coding. The requirement is not intended to be a technical trap for providers. As such, NAHC recommends that HHAs compare the billing and OASIS HIPPs codes. If these codes match or if the billing code is the correct final code for the claim, the audits should not trigger retroactive claim denials. This argument is based on the 2009 rulemaking by CMS where the underlying purpose of making OASIS a condition of payment is clearly stated in 74 F.R. 58109-5811 (November 10, 2009). The purpose is to have the correct HIPPS code billed on the final claim.

This rulemaking sets out that CMS expected that the HHA would get a warning that an OASIS submission was noncompliant at a point that permitted the HHA to correct any deficiency. That would include a RAP or final claim cancellation and re-billing. With the reopening of claims nearly four years back, an HHA is denied the opportunity to correct the billings since the billing window is limited to 12 months.

In summary, the HHAs should protest any claim denial where the HIPPs code is correct.

4. Medicare law under 42 USC 1395gg prohibits any collection of an overpayment from a provider where the provider is "without fault" in receiving any overpayment. With the OASIS audits, an HHA should demand that SHS evaluate the application of the "without fault" provision. NAHC believes that HHAs have a reasonable basis for arguing that they are without fault as the rule was a new standard in 2010 and CMS did not extend the effective date as request in the rulemaking process in order for HHAs and their software vendors to have time to implement necessary systems changes. Instead, CMS implemented the proposed effective date of January 1, 2010 because it concluded that the review of the OASIS and claims submissions would allow HHAs time to correct any deficiencies, as set out in the Federal Register referenced above.

5. HHAs that do not succeed in deflecting or reversing claims denials in the OASIS audits should pursue formal administrative appeals using the arguments set out in 1-4 above.

NAHC's goal in its advocacy with CMS on this issue is to stop the audits and reverse all claim denials issued to date. However, while this advocacy is ongoing, it is strongly recommended that HHAs protect their individual rights following the recommendations in 1-5 above.




©  National Association for Home Care & Hospice. All Rights Reserved.