Skip to Main Content
National Association for Home Care & Hospice
Twitter Facebook Pintrest


In the various roles he has undertaken through the years, Val J. Halamandaris has been a singular driving force behind the policy and program initiatives resulting in the recognition of home health care as a viable alternative to institutionalization. His dedication to consumer advocacy, which enhances the quality of life and dignity of those receiving home health care, merits VNA HealthCare Group’s highest recognition and deepest respect. 

VNA HealthCare Group

I have the highest respect for them, especially for the nurses, aides and therapists, who devote their lives to caring for people with disabilities, the infirm and dying Americans.  There are few more noble professions.

President Barack Obama

Home health care agencies do such a wonderful job in this country helping people to be able to remain at home and allowing them to receive services

U.S. Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) Chair, Democratic Steering and Outreach Committee

Home care is a combination of compassion and efficiency.  It is less expensive than institutional care...but at the same time it is a more caring, human, intimate experience, and therefore it has a greater human’s a big mistake not to try to maximize it and find ways to give people the home care option over either nursing homes, hospitals or other institutions

Former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives Newt Gingrich (R-GA)

Medicaid covers long-term care, but only for low-income families.  And Medicare only pays for care that is connected to a hospital discharge....our health care system must cover these vital services...[and] we should promote home-based care, which most people prefer, instead of the institutional care that we emphasize now.

Former U.S. Senator Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-CD)

We need incentives to...keep people in home health care settings...It’s dramatically less expensive than long term care.

U.S. Senator John McCain (R-AZ)


Home care is clearly the wave of the future. It’s clearly where patients want to be cared for. I come from an ethnic family and when a member of our family is severely ill, we would never consider taking them to get institutional care. That’s true of many families for both cultural and financial reasons. If patients have a choice of where they want to be cared for, where it’s done the right way, they choose home.

Donna Shalala, former Secretary of Health and Human Services

A couple of years ago, I spent a little bit of time with the National Association for Home Care & Hospice and its president, Val J. Halamandaris, and I was just blown away. What impressed me so much was that they talked about what they do as opposed to just the strategies of how to deal with Washington or Sacramento or Albany or whatever the case may be. Val is a fanatic about care, and it comes through in every way known to mankind. It comes through in the speakers he invites to their events; it comes through in all the stuff he shares.

Tom Peters, author of In Search of Excellence

Val’s home care organization brings thousands of caregivers together into a dynamic organization that provides them with valuable resources and tools to be even better in their important work. He helps them build self-esteem, which leads to self-motivation.

Mike Vance, former Dean of Disney and author of Think Out of the Box

Val is one of the greatest advocates for seniors in America. He goes beyond the call of duty every time.

Arthur S. Flemming, former Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare

Val has brought the problems, the challenges, and the opportunities out in the open for everyone to look at. He is a visionary pointing the direction for us. 

Margaret (Peg) Cushman, Professor of Nursing and former President of the Visiting Nurses Association

Although Val has chosen to stay in the background, he deserves much of the credit for what was accomplished both at the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging, where he was closely associated with me and at the House Select Committee on Aging, where he was Congressman Claude Pepper’s senior counsel and closest advisor. He put together more hearings on the subject of aging, wrote more reports, drafted more bills, and had more influence on the direction of events than anyone before him or since.

Frank E. Moss, former U.S. Senator

Val’s most important contribution is pulling together all elements of home health care and being able to organize and energize the people involved in the industry.

Frank E. Moss, former U.S. Senator

Anyone working on health care issues in Congress knows the name Val J. Halamandaris.

Kathleen Gardner Cravedi, former Staff Director of the House Select Committee on Aging

Without your untiring support and active participation, the voices of people advocating meaningful and compassionate health care reform may not have been heard by national leaders.

Michael Sullivan, Former Executive Director, Indiana Association for Home Care

All of us have been members of many organizations and NAHC is simply the best there is. NAHC aspires to excellence in every respect; its staff has been repeatedly honored as the best in Washington; the organization lives by the highest values and has demonstrated a passionate interest in the well-being of patients and providers.

Elaine Stephens, Director of Home Care of Steward Home Care/Steward Health Systems and former NAHC C

Home care increasingly is one of the basic building blocks in the developing system of long-term care.  On both economic and recuperative bases, home health care will continue to grow as an essential service for individuals, for families and for the community as a whole.

Former U.S. Senator Olympia Snowe (R-ME)

NCOA is excited to be part of this great event and honored to have such influential award winners in the field of aging.

National Council of Aging

Health care at home…is something we need more of, not less of.  Let us make a commitment to preventive and long-term care.  Let us encourage home care as an alternative to nursing homes and give folks a little help to have their parents there.

Former President Bill Clinton

Beneficiaries Sue New York Over Loss of HCBS Services

July 29, 2014 09:07 AM

On July 15, in Taylor v. Zucker, the New York Legal Assistance Group (NYLAG) filed a lawsuit (the Complaint) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf on three plaintiffs for the loss of Medicaid home care services due to the state’s transition to managed care. The Plaintiffs also sought to establish class action status. NAHC’s affiliate, the National Council on Medicaid Home Care, discusses the key elements of the lawsuit below.

The Plaintiffs sued New York for “denying, reducing and terminating Plaintiffs’ Medicaid home care services, by sending inadequate and untimely notices” as well as “failing to provide an opportunity for a fair hearing with ‘aid continuing’” “both of which threaten to result in the unnecessary institutionalization of Plaintiffs.” For details, see page 3, here. In New York, “Medicaid home care services” refers to home health, personal care, private duty nursing, and other types of long-term care services. For the full definition, see pages 8 to 9, here. Also, all Plaintiffs lacked “a change in their condition or circumstances that would justify the reduction or termination of their home care.”


As mentioned in the Complaint, in New York, all Medicaid home care services shifted to managed care. Medicaid managed care first came to New York with the approval of a Section 1115 waiver in 1997, called the Partnership Plan. In 2012, CMS expanded the Partnership Plan waiver to require mandatory enrollment in Managed Long-Term Care (MLTC) plans, which are managed care plans for long-term care. This 2012 amendment required beneficiaries dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid to enroll in MLTC plans to receive Medicaid home care services. For those just receiving Medicaid home care services, Medicaid home care services was included in managed care via mainstream Medicaid managed care plans (MMCs) beginning August 2011. For details of the history of the evolution of Medicaid managed care in home care in New York, see pages 9 to 11, here.

The Complaint further stated that, according to federal law, Medicaid MCOs must provide the same extent of services that they are available in Medicaid fee-for-service, and that state contracts with MCOs are required to provide services “in an amount, duration, and scope that is no less than…under fee-for-service Medicaid.” Such state contracts must also define “medically necessary services” in a way no more restrictive than Medicaid fee-for-service. Also, the MCOs, just like the state must do in fee-for-service Medicaid, must send notices regarding suspension, reduction, or termination of services at least ten days in advance.


The Plaintiffs alleged the following:

The Plaintiffs. Plaintiff Janie Taylor is an 84-year old woman who received Medicaid home care services for 10 hours per day, 7 days per week since 2011. The extent of this assistance was “critical to enable her to safely engage in her basic daily activities, including going to the bathroom and preparing meals.” She was mandatorily enrolled in a MLTC in March 2013.  Initially, the MLTC kept her Medicaid home care services hours as is. On June 23, 2014, Ms. Taylor received a notice from the MLTC stating that she was authorized to receive services for 5 hours, 7 days a week, for the period of July 1, 2014 through the end of the year.

The MLTC document sent to Ms. Taylor did not claim to “reduce” her care, but merely stated that the document was a “new authorization.” Despite New York ordering aid-continuing on July 2, the MLTC had not restored Ms. Taylor’s care to 10 hours per day, 7 days per week.  For the full details, see pages 15 to 18, here.

Plaintiff Eddy Lemieux is an 18-year old man that due to multiple conditions requires 24-hour-per day continuous care. He originally received care through the Consumer Directed Personal Assistance Program (CDPAP), 24 hours per day in 12-hour shifts. In 2012, he was mandatorily enrolled in a MLTC. On January 14, 2014, the MLTC sent Mr. Lemieux a “notice of authorization” that tapered his care from 12 hours on January 25, 2014 to discontinuing services on April 22, 2014.

The notice stated that his previous level of care was “not medically necessary” but did not substantiate this claim. Mr. Lemieux’s services were then reduced in contrast to an appeals decision. For the full details, see pages 18 to 23, here.

Plaintiff Anibal Santiago is a 65-year old man enrolled in a MMC since 2007 for receipt of personal care services. For about three years prior to April 2014, Mr. Santiago received Medicaid home care services from the MMC for 12 hours per day, 7 days per week. On April 2, 2014, the MMC sent him a notice “approving” him for 4 hours per day, 7 days per week care.

This notice, even though it was “effectively a reduction notice” did not state anything to that effect, but was presented as an approval notice. An additional notice sent April 7 claimed that the reason for the reduction was “medical documents” but did not provide evidence of a change of medical condition. On appeal, the MMC stated on May 2 that Mr. Santiago’s care would be 8 hours per day, 7 days per week, and on May 3, his care was so reduced. For the full details, see pages 23 to 26, here.

Causes of Action. In addition to various federal and state laws, the Complaint alleges that New York violated the Due Process clause of the 14th Amendment to the United State Constitution, as well as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act. Specifically, the Complaint alleged that New York violated the Plaintiffs’ right to adequate notice and a fair hearing before “threatening to reduce or terminate, and of actually denying, reducing or terminating home care services” as well as the right to receive aid-continuing. Additionally, Plaintiffs alleged that New York reduced or terminated home care services when there “has been no change in the recipient’s condition or circumstances that would justify the reduction or termination,” and that the state’s actions threaten to unnecessarily institutionalize the Plaintiffs. For the full details, see pages 30 to 31, here.

Class Certification and Relief Requested

The Complaint also petitioned that the Court recognize their suit as a class action lawsuit, comprised of:

All current and future Medicaid recipients in New York State who receive home care services through Medicaid Managed Care Organizations and who have suffered or will suffer threatened or actual denials, reductions, or terminations of their home care services without timely and adequate notice, and/or without any change in their condition or circumstances which would justify a reduction or termination, and/or without aid-continuing benefits pending internal appeals and the issuance of Decisions After Fair Hearings[.] [Complaint, 31-32]

Additionally, the Plaintiffs requested the reinstatement of previous home care services hours, and preventing New York from reducing or terminating home care services when no change has justified such reduction or termination. For full details, see page 32-33, here.


The allegations in the Complaint raise significant access and process issues. As stated above, Medicaid MCOs must provide the same extent of services, and notice of termination of services, as under fee-for-service Medicaid. The facts alleged in this case raise significant concerns echoed nationwide that, in the widespread transition of LTSS to managed care, beneficiaries will be afforded the same protections that they had in traditional Medicaid. The Council supports ensuring access to home care services in the managed care model.

The Council is monitoring practices of states in transition to managed care with regard to provider rights. The Council encourages providers to continue to advocate for greater support of HCBS in managed care through their state associations, as well as through state and federal governments. Home care providers are encouraged to keep abreast of managed care developments in their states, and nationally, and to contact the Council with any questions or concerns.





©  National Association for Home Care & Hospice. All Rights Reserved.