Skip to Main Content
National Association for Home Care & Hospice
Twitter Facebook Pintrest


In the various roles he has undertaken through the years, Val J. Halamandaris has been a singular driving force behind the policy and program initiatives resulting in the recognition of home health care as a viable alternative to institutionalization. His dedication to consumer advocacy, which enhances the quality of life and dignity of those receiving home health care, merits VNA HealthCare Group’s highest recognition and deepest respect. 

VNA HealthCare Group

I have the highest respect for them, especially for the nurses, aides and therapists, who devote their lives to caring for people with disabilities, the infirm and dying Americans.  There are few more noble professions.

President Barack Obama

Home health care agencies do such a wonderful job in this country helping people to be able to remain at home and allowing them to receive services

U.S. Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) Chair, Democratic Steering and Outreach Committee

Home care is a combination of compassion and efficiency.  It is less expensive than institutional care...but at the same time it is a more caring, human, intimate experience, and therefore it has a greater human’s a big mistake not to try to maximize it and find ways to give people the home care option over either nursing homes, hospitals or other institutions

Former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives Newt Gingrich (R-GA)

Medicaid covers long-term care, but only for low-income families.  And Medicare only pays for care that is connected to a hospital discharge....our health care system must cover these vital services...[and] we should promote home-based care, which most people prefer, instead of the institutional care that we emphasize now.

Former U.S. Senator Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-CD)

We need incentives to...keep people in home health care settings...It’s dramatically less expensive than long term care.

U.S. Senator John McCain (R-AZ)


Home care is clearly the wave of the future. It’s clearly where patients want to be cared for. I come from an ethnic family and when a member of our family is severely ill, we would never consider taking them to get institutional care. That’s true of many families for both cultural and financial reasons. If patients have a choice of where they want to be cared for, where it’s done the right way, they choose home.

Donna Shalala, former Secretary of Health and Human Services

A couple of years ago, I spent a little bit of time with the National Association for Home Care & Hospice and its president, Val J. Halamandaris, and I was just blown away. What impressed me so much was that they talked about what they do as opposed to just the strategies of how to deal with Washington or Sacramento or Albany or whatever the case may be. Val is a fanatic about care, and it comes through in every way known to mankind. It comes through in the speakers he invites to their events; it comes through in all the stuff he shares.

Tom Peters, author of In Search of Excellence

Val’s home care organization brings thousands of caregivers together into a dynamic organization that provides them with valuable resources and tools to be even better in their important work. He helps them build self-esteem, which leads to self-motivation.

Mike Vance, former Dean of Disney and author of Think Out of the Box

Val is one of the greatest advocates for seniors in America. He goes beyond the call of duty every time.

Arthur S. Flemming, former Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare

Val has brought the problems, the challenges, and the opportunities out in the open for everyone to look at. He is a visionary pointing the direction for us. 

Margaret (Peg) Cushman, Professor of Nursing and former President of the Visiting Nurses Association

Although Val has chosen to stay in the background, he deserves much of the credit for what was accomplished both at the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging, where he was closely associated with me and at the House Select Committee on Aging, where he was Congressman Claude Pepper’s senior counsel and closest advisor. He put together more hearings on the subject of aging, wrote more reports, drafted more bills, and had more influence on the direction of events than anyone before him or since.

Frank E. Moss, former U.S. Senator

Val’s most important contribution is pulling together all elements of home health care and being able to organize and energize the people involved in the industry.

Frank E. Moss, former U.S. Senator

Anyone working on health care issues in Congress knows the name Val J. Halamandaris.

Kathleen Gardner Cravedi, former Staff Director of the House Select Committee on Aging

Without your untiring support and active participation, the voices of people advocating meaningful and compassionate health care reform may not have been heard by national leaders.

Michael Sullivan, Former Executive Director, Indiana Association for Home Care

All of us have been members of many organizations and NAHC is simply the best there is. NAHC aspires to excellence in every respect; its staff has been repeatedly honored as the best in Washington; the organization lives by the highest values and has demonstrated a passionate interest in the well-being of patients and providers.

Elaine Stephens, Director of Home Care of Steward Home Care/Steward Health Systems and former NAHC C

Home care increasingly is one of the basic building blocks in the developing system of long-term care.  On both economic and recuperative bases, home health care will continue to grow as an essential service for individuals, for families and for the community as a whole.

Former U.S. Senator Olympia Snowe (R-ME)

NCOA is excited to be part of this great event and honored to have such influential award winners in the field of aging.

National Council of Aging

Health care at home…is something we need more of, not less of.  Let us make a commitment to preventive and long-term care.  Let us encourage home care as an alternative to nursing homes and give folks a little help to have their parents there.

Former President Bill Clinton

NAHC Develops Recommendations for Hospital-based Hospice Cost Report Revisions

Stakeholders encouraged to comment by April 7
April 2, 2015 09:09 AM

On February 6, 2015, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) published notice requesting comment on significant proposed revisions to the Hospital and Hospital Health Care Complex Cost Report that incorporate changes previously made to the Hospice Cost Report for freestanding agencies (for previous NAHC Report coverage go here and here).  CMS posted the forms, instructions and related materials three weeks later to its Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) website.  PRA items must go through two comment periods (one for 60 days and a second for 30 days) prior to being finalized.  The Feb. 6 notice represents the first request for comment, and comments are due next Tuesday (April 7, 2015).

The freestanding hospice cost report revisions that went into effect for cost reporting years beginning on or after October 1, 2014, underwent the same comment process.  In response to industry input, CMS made considerable changes to the freestanding cost report forms and instructions but did not address a number of issues that stakeholders believe are important to ensure that the cost report accurately reflects hospice financial operations or provide greater clarity relative to specific cost report items.  In draft comments on the hospital-based hospice cost report revisions, the National Association for Home Care & Hospice (NAHC) has identified several key areas that it believes CMS must correct as part of the hospital-based hospice cost report, and NAHC is urging that CMS make plans at this time to also make these corrections to the freestanding hospice cost report.  NAHC also references additional clarifications and corrections that were suggested during previous hospice cost report comment opportunities that, if adopted, would significantly improve understanding of the cost reporting process and the principles that underlie it, and recommends that CMS also consider making those changes at this time.

Following is an excerpt from the draft comments NAHC has prepared for submission to CMS on the hospital-based hospice cost report revisions:


Effective Date.  Based on input we have sought from hospital-based hospice providers, they are not currently set up to meet the terms of the proposed changes, and most certainly cannot effect the needed changes retroactive to October 1, 2014, the proposed effective date.  All hospices need about one year’s time to adapt to the cost reporting changes; the one-year clock should start with final release of changes to the cost reporting forms and instructions.  Therefore, we strongly urge that CMS revise the October 1, 2014, effective date and set the effective date on a prospective basis such that hospital-based organizations have one year following final release of the changes to comply.

Estimate of Burden.  The estimate of increased burden supplied by CMS as part of the Supporting Statement for Form CMS-2552-10 aggregates the financial impact of the changes related to hospices and federally-qualified health centers.  Failure to supply hospice-specific (or FQHC-specific) impact data makes it impossible to comment on the accuracy and adequacy of CMS’ increased burden estimate.  We recommend that CMS provide separate breakdowns of the estimated increased financial burden for hospital-based hospices and FQHCs so that CMS’ burden estimate of the changes can be assessed.  


Calculation of Average Length of Stay (ALOS).  We recommend that CMS restore the ALOS statistics as part of the cost report (for both freestanding and hospital-based organizations) but base the statistic on patients discharged during the cost reporting year.  Further, rather than allow for the cost reporting software to calculate the statistic, the instructions should direct the hospice to calculate its own ALOS rate and provide clear instruction for doing so. 

Cost Centers.  The revisions to the hospice cost report significantly expand the general service cost centers.  However, we have the following specific concerns related to these changes:

Pharmacy:  Pharmacy costs are directly related to delivery of patient care and therefore should NOT be classified as a General Service Cost Center.  These are most appropriately considered Direct Patient Care costs, from which hospices should be permitted to accurately identify in the accounting records or reclassify costs by level of care based on patient charges or other appropriate statistical basis.

Capital Related Costs/ Movable Equipment:  For Capital Related Costs/Movable Equipment, in both the final freestanding cost report and as part of the proposed hospital-based hospice cost report CMS has specified use of dollar value as the exclusive method for allocation of these costs unless the hospice is able, in advance of the end of the cost reporting year, to get permission from its assigned Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) to use an alternative statistic.  However, unless the hospice secures permission to use an alternative statistic in advance of the cost reporting year’s start, it must gather statistics according to the cost report-specified statistic.  Given that CMS previously allowed use of either dollar value or square feet for Capital Related Costs/Movable Equipment, we strongly urge that CMS revert to these same options.

Volunteer, Plant Operations and Maintenance, and Staff Transportation:  These Cost Centers should be listed PRIOR to the Administrative & General Cost Center to allow for allocation of these costs to the Administrative & General cost center.  The rationale is that volunteers perform administrative work, space occupancy costs of administrative offices (the majority of providers do NOT operate a “facility”) must be reclassified to Administrative & General under the existing methodology in place for freestanding providers, and administrative staff incur travel expenses.   

Housekeeping:  It would be helpful if CMS could clarify the purpose of this cost center as it is not clear whether this cost center is expected to include housekeeping related to a hospice’s facility (if it has one) and/or housekeeping or cleaning of administrative office space.  Administrative office space cleaning may be most appropriately entered on the line for Plant Operations and Maintenance (which, as recommended earlier, should be placed above the A & G Cost Center), and CMS could provide clarification that the Housekeeping cost center is appropriate for facility housekeeping costs only.

Nursing Facility Room & Board:  As has been noted in comments on the freestanding hospice cost report revisions, NF Room & Board should not be treated as “pass through” transactions; regardless, we encourage CMS to adapt the treatment of NF Room & Board to ensure that no administrative costs are allocated to this category.

NAHC urges stakeholders -- particularly hospital-based hospice organizations -- to comment on issues of concern relative to the proposed cost report revisions.  Of particular concern for most organizations should be the retroactive effective date (for cost reporting years beginning on or after October 1, 2014) of the proposed changes.  Instructions for comment are available at the following location:!documentDetail;D=CMS-2015-0024-0001.




©  National Association for Home Care & Hospice. All Rights Reserved.