Skip to Main Content
National Association for Home Care & Hospice
Twitter Facebook Pintrest


In the various roles he has undertaken through the years, Val J. Halamandaris has been a singular driving force behind the policy and program initiatives resulting in the recognition of home health care as a viable alternative to institutionalization. His dedication to consumer advocacy, which enhances the quality of life and dignity of those receiving home health care, merits VNA HealthCare Group’s highest recognition and deepest respect. 

VNA HealthCare Group

I have the highest respect for them, especially for the nurses, aides and therapists, who devote their lives to caring for people with disabilities, the infirm and dying Americans.  There are few more noble professions.

President Barack Obama

Home health care agencies do such a wonderful job in this country helping people to be able to remain at home and allowing them to receive services

U.S. Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) Chair, Democratic Steering and Outreach Committee

Home care is a combination of compassion and efficiency.  It is less expensive than institutional care...but at the same time it is a more caring, human, intimate experience, and therefore it has a greater human’s a big mistake not to try to maximize it and find ways to give people the home care option over either nursing homes, hospitals or other institutions

Former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives Newt Gingrich (R-GA)

Medicaid covers long-term care, but only for low-income families.  And Medicare only pays for care that is connected to a hospital discharge....our health care system must cover these vital services...[and] we should promote home-based care, which most people prefer, instead of the institutional care that we emphasize now.

Former U.S. Senator Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-CD)

We need incentives to...keep people in home health care settings...It’s dramatically less expensive than long term care.

U.S. Senator John McCain (R-AZ)


Home care is clearly the wave of the future. It’s clearly where patients want to be cared for. I come from an ethnic family and when a member of our family is severely ill, we would never consider taking them to get institutional care. That’s true of many families for both cultural and financial reasons. If patients have a choice of where they want to be cared for, where it’s done the right way, they choose home.

Donna Shalala, former Secretary of Health and Human Services

A couple of years ago, I spent a little bit of time with the National Association for Home Care & Hospice and its president, Val J. Halamandaris, and I was just blown away. What impressed me so much was that they talked about what they do as opposed to just the strategies of how to deal with Washington or Sacramento or Albany or whatever the case may be. Val is a fanatic about care, and it comes through in every way known to mankind. It comes through in the speakers he invites to their events; it comes through in all the stuff he shares.

Tom Peters, author of In Search of Excellence

Val’s home care organization brings thousands of caregivers together into a dynamic organization that provides them with valuable resources and tools to be even better in their important work. He helps them build self-esteem, which leads to self-motivation.

Mike Vance, former Dean of Disney and author of Think Out of the Box

Val is one of the greatest advocates for seniors in America. He goes beyond the call of duty every time.

Arthur S. Flemming, former Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare

Val has brought the problems, the challenges, and the opportunities out in the open for everyone to look at. He is a visionary pointing the direction for us. 

Margaret (Peg) Cushman, Professor of Nursing and former President of the Visiting Nurses Association

Although Val has chosen to stay in the background, he deserves much of the credit for what was accomplished both at the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging, where he was closely associated with me and at the House Select Committee on Aging, where he was Congressman Claude Pepper’s senior counsel and closest advisor. He put together more hearings on the subject of aging, wrote more reports, drafted more bills, and had more influence on the direction of events than anyone before him or since.

Frank E. Moss, former U.S. Senator

Val’s most important contribution is pulling together all elements of home health care and being able to organize and energize the people involved in the industry.

Frank E. Moss, former U.S. Senator

Anyone working on health care issues in Congress knows the name Val J. Halamandaris.

Kathleen Gardner Cravedi, former Staff Director of the House Select Committee on Aging

Without your untiring support and active participation, the voices of people advocating meaningful and compassionate health care reform may not have been heard by national leaders.

Michael Sullivan, Former Executive Director, Indiana Association for Home Care

All of us have been members of many organizations and NAHC is simply the best there is. NAHC aspires to excellence in every respect; its staff has been repeatedly honored as the best in Washington; the organization lives by the highest values and has demonstrated a passionate interest in the well-being of patients and providers.

Elaine Stephens, Director of Home Care of Steward Home Care/Steward Health Systems and former NAHC C

Home care increasingly is one of the basic building blocks in the developing system of long-term care.  On both economic and recuperative bases, home health care will continue to grow as an essential service for individuals, for families and for the community as a whole.

Former U.S. Senator Olympia Snowe (R-ME)

NCOA is excited to be part of this great event and honored to have such influential award winners in the field of aging.

National Council of Aging

Health care at home…is something we need more of, not less of.  Let us make a commitment to preventive and long-term care.  Let us encourage home care as an alternative to nursing homes and give folks a little help to have their parents there.

Former President Bill Clinton

NAHC Brief Filed in Overtime Lawsuit at Court of Appeals

April 2, 2015 01:05 PM

The lawsuit challenging the validity of the US Department of Labor rules that would essentially eradicate the longstanding overtime exemptions for companionship services and live-in domestic services under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) is moving closer to decision at the US Court of Appeals. On March 31, 2015, NAHC and its co-appellees filed their brief in response to the Department of Labor’s appeal of the decision of the U.S. District Court that vacated the Department’s planned rule changes. One more brief will be filed by the Department prior to the oral argument that is scheduled for May 7 in Washington, D.C. A decision is expected in late June or early July based on previous actions of the appellate court.

The NAHC brief argues that the District Court ruling properly vacated the regulations, finding them to be in violation of the plain language of the FLSA. Specifically, the brief argues that the FLSA language exemption “any employee” performing companionship services or live-in care does not permit the Department of Labor (DoL) to exclude employed by home care companies thereby limiting the exemptions to workers directly employed by the consumer. Further, NAHC argues that the change in definition of “companionship services” is also in conflict with the FLSA plain language. The challenged rule would limit the amount of personal care that could be provided to no more than 20% in combination with housekeeping services. However, as expressed in the brief, “care” is the only reference Congress used in 1974 when it created the exemption in the FLSA.

As an alternative argument, the brief explains that the rule changes are also “arbitrary and capricious interpretations of the exemptions.  NAHC argues that it is irrational to claim that Congress gave the Department the authority to redefine the exemptions to the extent that 90% or more (DoL admits to 90-98%) of the employees currently subject to the exemption would no longer be exempt.  In addition, NAHC argues that there have been no changes in the nature of the personal care work done for the elderly and infirm to justify the rule change. DoL argues that the change is valid because of the growth in the home care industry. NHC replies that the very purpose of the exemptions as established by Congress in 1974 was to make home care affordable as an alternative to institutional care. The growth of home care means that the exemptions are working.

It is expected that NAHC and its co-appellees will gain the support of several “friend of the court” briefs. The likely supporters include Members of Congress, several disability rights advocacy groups, and some state Medicaid programs.

For those interested in a copy of the brief, it is accessible here.




©  National Association for Home Care & Hospice. All Rights Reserved.