Skip to Main Content
National Association for Home Care & Hospice
Twitter Facebook Pintrest


In the various roles he has undertaken through the years, Val J. Halamandaris has been a singular driving force behind the policy and program initiatives resulting in the recognition of home health care as a viable alternative to institutionalization. His dedication to consumer advocacy, which enhances the quality of life and dignity of those receiving home health care, merits VNA HealthCare Group’s highest recognition and deepest respect. 

VNA HealthCare Group

I have the highest respect for them, especially for the nurses, aides and therapists, who devote their lives to caring for people with disabilities, the infirm and dying Americans.  There are few more noble professions.

President Barack Obama

Home health care agencies do such a wonderful job in this country helping people to be able to remain at home and allowing them to receive services

U.S. Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) Chair, Democratic Steering and Outreach Committee

Home care is a combination of compassion and efficiency.  It is less expensive than institutional care...but at the same time it is a more caring, human, intimate experience, and therefore it has a greater human’s a big mistake not to try to maximize it and find ways to give people the home care option over either nursing homes, hospitals or other institutions

Former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives Newt Gingrich (R-GA)

Medicaid covers long-term care, but only for low-income families.  And Medicare only pays for care that is connected to a hospital discharge....our health care system must cover these vital services...[and] we should promote home-based care, which most people prefer, instead of the institutional care that we emphasize now.

Former U.S. Senator Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-CD)

We need incentives to...keep people in home health care settings...It’s dramatically less expensive than long term care.

U.S. Senator John McCain (R-AZ)


Home care is clearly the wave of the future. It’s clearly where patients want to be cared for. I come from an ethnic family and when a member of our family is severely ill, we would never consider taking them to get institutional care. That’s true of many families for both cultural and financial reasons. If patients have a choice of where they want to be cared for, where it’s done the right way, they choose home.

Donna Shalala, former Secretary of Health and Human Services

A couple of years ago, I spent a little bit of time with the National Association for Home Care & Hospice and its president, Val J. Halamandaris, and I was just blown away. What impressed me so much was that they talked about what they do as opposed to just the strategies of how to deal with Washington or Sacramento or Albany or whatever the case may be. Val is a fanatic about care, and it comes through in every way known to mankind. It comes through in the speakers he invites to their events; it comes through in all the stuff he shares.

Tom Peters, author of In Search of Excellence

Val’s home care organization brings thousands of caregivers together into a dynamic organization that provides them with valuable resources and tools to be even better in their important work. He helps them build self-esteem, which leads to self-motivation.

Mike Vance, former Dean of Disney and author of Think Out of the Box

Val is one of the greatest advocates for seniors in America. He goes beyond the call of duty every time.

Arthur S. Flemming, former Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare

Val has brought the problems, the challenges, and the opportunities out in the open for everyone to look at. He is a visionary pointing the direction for us. 

Margaret (Peg) Cushman, Professor of Nursing and former President of the Visiting Nurses Association

Although Val has chosen to stay in the background, he deserves much of the credit for what was accomplished both at the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging, where he was closely associated with me and at the House Select Committee on Aging, where he was Congressman Claude Pepper’s senior counsel and closest advisor. He put together more hearings on the subject of aging, wrote more reports, drafted more bills, and had more influence on the direction of events than anyone before him or since.

Frank E. Moss, former U.S. Senator

Val’s most important contribution is pulling together all elements of home health care and being able to organize and energize the people involved in the industry.

Frank E. Moss, former U.S. Senator

Anyone working on health care issues in Congress knows the name Val J. Halamandaris.

Kathleen Gardner Cravedi, former Staff Director of the House Select Committee on Aging

Without your untiring support and active participation, the voices of people advocating meaningful and compassionate health care reform may not have been heard by national leaders.

Michael Sullivan, Former Executive Director, Indiana Association for Home Care

All of us have been members of many organizations and NAHC is simply the best there is. NAHC aspires to excellence in every respect; its staff has been repeatedly honored as the best in Washington; the organization lives by the highest values and has demonstrated a passionate interest in the well-being of patients and providers.

Elaine Stephens, Director of Home Care of Steward Home Care/Steward Health Systems and former NAHC C

Home care increasingly is one of the basic building blocks in the developing system of long-term care.  On both economic and recuperative bases, home health care will continue to grow as an essential service for individuals, for families and for the community as a whole.

Former U.S. Senator Olympia Snowe (R-ME)

NCOA is excited to be part of this great event and honored to have such influential award winners in the field of aging.

National Council of Aging

Health care at home…is something we need more of, not less of.  Let us make a commitment to preventive and long-term care.  Let us encourage home care as an alternative to nursing homes and give folks a little help to have their parents there.

Former President Bill Clinton

NAHC Recommends “Guiding Principles” to House Subcommittee for Improving Post-Acute Care

Submits Official Subcommittee Hearing Statement on Post-Acute Care Reform
April 17, 2015 09:41 AM

The National Association for Home Care & Hospice (NAHC) submitted a statement to the House Energy & Commerce Subcommittee on Health, which convened a hearing today to discuss the topic of post-acute care (PAC) delivery, including proposed legislation—the Bundling and Coordinating Post-Acute Care (BACPAC) Act (H.R. 1458).  In an official hearing statement submitted for the record, NAHC recommended guiding principles for Congress to reform PAC in such a way that improves care for seniors and extends the financial viability of the program.

The NAHC principles for evaluating any PAC reform proposal included:1) individuals should have access to care in the least restrictive and clinically appropriate care setting; 2) the original right of Medicare beneficiaries to have the freedom to choose any qualified provider should be preserved; 3) payment and service model reforms should be developed with the participation and input of all stakeholders; 4) any pre-existing, nonessential regulatory barriers to full success of the reforms should be removed; 5) with the great diversity in the Medicare population, any payment model should rely on a robust risk adjustment that fairly reflects the nature of the population served in the model; and 6) systemic reform should follow the pilot testing of multiple reform model options that are designed to determine the best path forward.

NAHC stated that Congress should learn from ongoing demonstration projects before moving forward with systemic change affecting access to and quality of care. NAHC said the demonstration projects, which were authorized under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and are currently being tested through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, will provide valuable guidance on how to reform the post acute care system.

“These demonstration programs offer the promise of increased understanding of what works and what does not,” NAHC said in its statement.  “Proceeding otherwise creates avoidable risks for Medicare and vulnerable Medicare beneficiaries.  Congress should monitor the bundling pilotprogramauthorizedby [the ACA]to ensure that we learn all that is possible before instituting systemic reform.”

NAHC said Congress should evaluate the bundling innovationsto ensure there are no adverse impacts on access to or quality of care.  One area of concern to monitor is any change in the administrativeburden onbeneficiaries and providers.  Another possible result to monitor is the creation of multiple payment systems, which could cause uneven Medicare coverage for patients with the same needs.

NAHC said the BACPAC Act “adds to the dialogue” and expressed appreciation to its cosponsors.  NAHC also applauded specific portions of the bill that would take advantage of home care innovations, as well as waive the homebound and face-to-face physician encounter documentation requirements. However, with the demonstration projects still ongoing, NAHC cautioned that moving forward with any bundling legislation, including the BACPAC Act, would be premature. 

“In line with NAHC’s longstanding position of advancing innovative reforms, we are supportive of the intended goals of BACPAC and appreciate the efforts of its sponsors,” NAHC said.  “We are concerned, however, that implementing nationwide PAC bundling at this time would be a massive systemic change without the benefit of the knowledge we stand to gain through the thousands of providers engaged in ongoing PAC bundling models.  As such, while BACPAC is an example of bundling to be considered, it is a time for learning what it takes to create the most successful reforms rather than for prematurely imposing an untried, systemic model of payment and service that would affect the care and lives of over 5 million Medicare beneficiaries who use PAC care annually.”

NAHC also expressed concerns with specific aspects of the legislation, including: it excludes Medicare physician services from bundling; it defers much of the design of PAC bundling to federal agencies; and it fails to integrate with the IMPACT Act with regards to developing uniform assessment tools to enable bundling in the PAC setting.

Members of Congress serving on the Subcommittee echoed NAHC’s concerns about the BACPAC Act.  Subcommittee Ranking Member Gene Green (D-TX) said that, while bundling payments has the potential to improve efficiency and facilitate care coordination, it is important to finish testing the new models.

“There is widespread agreement that new claimant and delivery models are necessary to improve our health care system and achieve better patient outcomes,” Green said.  “As providers and CMS are in the process of testing new models, there is still much work to do.  This work is ongoing and now is the time to dedicate resources toward building the knowledge base to help our understanding and inform decision making.  There are many potential policies to pursue and using the lessons learned from the recent efforts is an important step.  This must be done before considering large-scale adoption of reform.  Simply bundling payments in advance of this work would be premature.”

Congressman Frank Pallone (D-NJ) reiterated the need to learn and collect data from the current demonstration models before moving forward with the BACPAC Act or any other bundling legislation.  “We do not have any common and comparable data across post-acute care providers to determine which patients fare best in which settings, or even what appropriate levels of care are for patients of various acuity,” Pallone said.  “While there are many interesting policy ideas in this arena, we need to learn from the ACA efforts underway and the data being collected as a result of the IMPACT Act and provide enough time to ensure the models work in a way that doesn’t compromise access to high quality services for our beneficiaries.”

A number of witnesses reflected similar concerns. You can view the full list of witnesses and their testimony here.

In addition to stating the need for the demonstration projects and outlining guiding principles for PAC reform, NAHC proposed a community-based model for PAC care bundling. “Given the evidence regarding the importance of involving home health providers early in the care transitions process, the most effective bundling model integrates community-based care providers such as home health agencies into the hospital discharge planning process upon the admission of a qualified patient to the hospital.  The home health agency would be responsible for a comprehensive evaluation and PAC planning process that is designed to determine whether a patient is medically appropriate and feasible for discharge to the community.”

You can read NAHC’s full statement, which was included the subcommittee’s official record.




©  National Association for Home Care & Hospice. All Rights Reserved.