Skip to Main Content
National Association for Home Care & Hospice
Twitter Facebook Pintrest


In the various roles he has undertaken through the years, Val J. Halamandaris has been a singular driving force behind the policy and program initiatives resulting in the recognition of home health care as a viable alternative to institutionalization. His dedication to consumer advocacy, which enhances the quality of life and dignity of those receiving home health care, merits VNA HealthCare Group’s highest recognition and deepest respect. 

VNA HealthCare Group

I have the highest respect for them, especially for the nurses, aides and therapists, who devote their lives to caring for people with disabilities, the infirm and dying Americans.  There are few more noble professions.

President Barack Obama

Home health care agencies do such a wonderful job in this country helping people to be able to remain at home and allowing them to receive services

U.S. Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) Chair, Democratic Steering and Outreach Committee

Home care is a combination of compassion and efficiency.  It is less expensive than institutional care...but at the same time it is a more caring, human, intimate experience, and therefore it has a greater human’s a big mistake not to try to maximize it and find ways to give people the home care option over either nursing homes, hospitals or other institutions

Former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives Newt Gingrich (R-GA)

Medicaid covers long-term care, but only for low-income families.  And Medicare only pays for care that is connected to a hospital discharge....our health care system must cover these vital services...[and] we should promote home-based care, which most people prefer, instead of the institutional care that we emphasize now.

Former U.S. Senator Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-CD)

We need incentives to...keep people in home health care settings...It’s dramatically less expensive than long term care.

U.S. Senator John McCain (R-AZ)


Home care is clearly the wave of the future. It’s clearly where patients want to be cared for. I come from an ethnic family and when a member of our family is severely ill, we would never consider taking them to get institutional care. That’s true of many families for both cultural and financial reasons. If patients have a choice of where they want to be cared for, where it’s done the right way, they choose home.

Donna Shalala, former Secretary of Health and Human Services

A couple of years ago, I spent a little bit of time with the National Association for Home Care & Hospice and its president, Val J. Halamandaris, and I was just blown away. What impressed me so much was that they talked about what they do as opposed to just the strategies of how to deal with Washington or Sacramento or Albany or whatever the case may be. Val is a fanatic about care, and it comes through in every way known to mankind. It comes through in the speakers he invites to their events; it comes through in all the stuff he shares.

Tom Peters, author of In Search of Excellence

Val’s home care organization brings thousands of caregivers together into a dynamic organization that provides them with valuable resources and tools to be even better in their important work. He helps them build self-esteem, which leads to self-motivation.

Mike Vance, former Dean of Disney and author of Think Out of the Box

Val is one of the greatest advocates for seniors in America. He goes beyond the call of duty every time.

Arthur S. Flemming, former Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare

Val has brought the problems, the challenges, and the opportunities out in the open for everyone to look at. He is a visionary pointing the direction for us. 

Margaret (Peg) Cushman, Professor of Nursing and former President of the Visiting Nurses Association

Although Val has chosen to stay in the background, he deserves much of the credit for what was accomplished both at the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging, where he was closely associated with me and at the House Select Committee on Aging, where he was Congressman Claude Pepper’s senior counsel and closest advisor. He put together more hearings on the subject of aging, wrote more reports, drafted more bills, and had more influence on the direction of events than anyone before him or since.

Frank E. Moss, former U.S. Senator

Val’s most important contribution is pulling together all elements of home health care and being able to organize and energize the people involved in the industry.

Frank E. Moss, former U.S. Senator

Anyone working on health care issues in Congress knows the name Val J. Halamandaris.

Kathleen Gardner Cravedi, former Staff Director of the House Select Committee on Aging

Without your untiring support and active participation, the voices of people advocating meaningful and compassionate health care reform may not have been heard by national leaders.

Michael Sullivan, Former Executive Director, Indiana Association for Home Care

All of us have been members of many organizations and NAHC is simply the best there is. NAHC aspires to excellence in every respect; its staff has been repeatedly honored as the best in Washington; the organization lives by the highest values and has demonstrated a passionate interest in the well-being of patients and providers.

Elaine Stephens, Director of Home Care of Steward Home Care/Steward Health Systems and former NAHC C

Home care increasingly is one of the basic building blocks in the developing system of long-term care.  On both economic and recuperative bases, home health care will continue to grow as an essential service for individuals, for families and for the community as a whole.

Former U.S. Senator Olympia Snowe (R-ME)

NCOA is excited to be part of this great event and honored to have such influential award winners in the field of aging.

National Council of Aging

Health care at home…is something we need more of, not less of.  Let us make a commitment to preventive and long-term care.  Let us encourage home care as an alternative to nursing homes and give folks a little help to have their parents there.

Former President Bill Clinton

Supreme Court Expected to Rule by End of Month on Legality of ACA Subsidies

June 23, 2015 10:04 AM

This week or next, the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to rule on the legality of government subsidies under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) for citizens to purchase health insurance coverage on the federal exchange rather than a state-run exchange. With the decision pending, a great deal of uncertainty remains over how the Court will rule and the ramifications for the health care system with the prospect of over 6 million people potentially losing access to their health insurance subsidies.

Republicans, who control both the House and Senate, are divided over how to respond should the Court rule against the Obama administration and many are anxious about such a scenario. While the party has opposed the Affordable Care Act, many Republicans do not want to see or be held accountable for millions of people previously enrolled suddenly losing coverage. 

At the same time, Congressional Republicans have voted more than 50 times to repeal the ACA and some remain eager to repeal it once and for all. Those pursuing full repeal now face a new obstacle following the release of a report by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) last week that found repealing the law would significantly increase federal budget deficits. The CBO report stated that repealing the law would increase the federal budget deficits by $353 billion in the coming decade due to lost savings and revenue. After considering the economic effects of repeal, CBO stated the total increase in the deficit would be $137 billion over the coming decade.

Other Republicans in Congress have proposed more modest approaches but have failed to coalesce around a single strategy. Last week Republican leaders announced a plan that would delay the effect of a ruling against the administration for two years, allowing the subsidies to remain in place until 2017. In theory, this would give Congress and the states enough time to find a solution by delaying the issue until after the 2016 elections. Congressman Paul Ryan (R-WI) has proposed providing the states block grants instead of subsidies for the same two year period.

Democrats and the White House, on the other hand, have already announced that they have no “Plan B.” They very much want to protect President Obama’s signature legislative achievement, and they have made it clear they expect the Court to rule in the administration’s favor. Earlier this month, President Obama was quoted saying that it was an “easy case” and “it probably shouldn’t have even been taken up” by the Court.

NAHC Report will continue to provide updates as well as further analysis about the effects on home care and hospice should the subsidies be ruled illegal.




©  National Association for Home Care & Hospice. All Rights Reserved.