Skip to Main Content
National Association for Home Care & Hospice
Twitter Facebook Pintrest


In the various roles he has undertaken through the years, Val J. Halamandaris has been a singular driving force behind the policy and program initiatives resulting in the recognition of home health care as a viable alternative to institutionalization. His dedication to consumer advocacy, which enhances the quality of life and dignity of those receiving home health care, merits VNA HealthCare Group’s highest recognition and deepest respect. 

VNA HealthCare Group

I have the highest respect for them, especially for the nurses, aides and therapists, who devote their lives to caring for people with disabilities, the infirm and dying Americans.  There are few more noble professions.

President Barack Obama

Home health care agencies do such a wonderful job in this country helping people to be able to remain at home and allowing them to receive services

U.S. Senator Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) Chair, Democratic Steering and Outreach Committee

Home care is a combination of compassion and efficiency.  It is less expensive than institutional care...but at the same time it is a more caring, human, intimate experience, and therefore it has a greater human’s a big mistake not to try to maximize it and find ways to give people the home care option over either nursing homes, hospitals or other institutions

Former Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives Newt Gingrich (R-GA)

Medicaid covers long-term care, but only for low-income families.  And Medicare only pays for care that is connected to a hospital discharge....our health care system must cover these vital services...[and] we should promote home-based care, which most people prefer, instead of the institutional care that we emphasize now.

Former U.S. Senator Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-CD)

We need incentives to...keep people in home health care settings...It’s dramatically less expensive than long term care.

U.S. Senator John McCain (R-AZ)


Home care is clearly the wave of the future. It’s clearly where patients want to be cared for. I come from an ethnic family and when a member of our family is severely ill, we would never consider taking them to get institutional care. That’s true of many families for both cultural and financial reasons. If patients have a choice of where they want to be cared for, where it’s done the right way, they choose home.

Donna Shalala, former Secretary of Health and Human Services

A couple of years ago, I spent a little bit of time with the National Association for Home Care & Hospice and its president, Val J. Halamandaris, and I was just blown away. What impressed me so much was that they talked about what they do as opposed to just the strategies of how to deal with Washington or Sacramento or Albany or whatever the case may be. Val is a fanatic about care, and it comes through in every way known to mankind. It comes through in the speakers he invites to their events; it comes through in all the stuff he shares.

Tom Peters, author of In Search of Excellence

Val’s home care organization brings thousands of caregivers together into a dynamic organization that provides them with valuable resources and tools to be even better in their important work. He helps them build self-esteem, which leads to self-motivation.

Mike Vance, former Dean of Disney and author of Think Out of the Box

Val is one of the greatest advocates for seniors in America. He goes beyond the call of duty every time.

Arthur S. Flemming, former Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare

Val has brought the problems, the challenges, and the opportunities out in the open for everyone to look at. He is a visionary pointing the direction for us. 

Margaret (Peg) Cushman, Professor of Nursing and former President of the Visiting Nurses Association

Although Val has chosen to stay in the background, he deserves much of the credit for what was accomplished both at the U.S. Senate Special Committee on Aging, where he was closely associated with me and at the House Select Committee on Aging, where he was Congressman Claude Pepper’s senior counsel and closest advisor. He put together more hearings on the subject of aging, wrote more reports, drafted more bills, and had more influence on the direction of events than anyone before him or since.

Frank E. Moss, former U.S. Senator

Val’s most important contribution is pulling together all elements of home health care and being able to organize and energize the people involved in the industry.

Frank E. Moss, former U.S. Senator

Anyone working on health care issues in Congress knows the name Val J. Halamandaris.

Kathleen Gardner Cravedi, former Staff Director of the House Select Committee on Aging

Without your untiring support and active participation, the voices of people advocating meaningful and compassionate health care reform may not have been heard by national leaders.

Michael Sullivan, Former Executive Director, Indiana Association for Home Care

All of us have been members of many organizations and NAHC is simply the best there is. NAHC aspires to excellence in every respect; its staff has been repeatedly honored as the best in Washington; the organization lives by the highest values and has demonstrated a passionate interest in the well-being of patients and providers.

Elaine Stephens, Director of Home Care of Steward Home Care/Steward Health Systems and former NAHC C

Home care increasingly is one of the basic building blocks in the developing system of long-term care.  On both economic and recuperative bases, home health care will continue to grow as an essential service for individuals, for families and for the community as a whole.

Former U.S. Senator Olympia Snowe (R-ME)

NCOA is excited to be part of this great event and honored to have such influential award winners in the field of aging.

National Council of Aging

Health care at home…is something we need more of, not less of.  Let us make a commitment to preventive and long-term care.  Let us encourage home care as an alternative to nursing homes and give folks a little help to have their parents there.

Former President Bill Clinton

NAHC Submits Formal Comments on Provider Enrollment Rule Proposed Changes

May 6, 2016 11:39 AM

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking  that includes significant changes to provider enrollment requirements along with proposals to change the moratoria authority rule and expand the requirements that physician that order, certify, or refer Medicare patients be enrolled in the Medicare system. These proposals may seem technical and innocuous, but each of them can have significant impact on a provider’s status in Medicare and Medicaid. The National Association for Home Care & Hospice (NAHC) submitted formal comments to CMS on these proposals, recommending a series of modifications and clarifications.

At the outset of its comments, NAHC suggests that all Medicare/Medicaid program integrity measures should be evaluated against a comprehensive set of guiding principles. The recommended set of 10 principles include:

  1. The program integrity measure must be best targeted to the fraud, waste, and abuse of concern.
  2. Program integrity measures should be evidence-based with a demonstrated return on investment.
  3. The most effective program integrity measures are those that avoid or prevent fraud, waste, and abuse.
  4. Stakeholder support is essential to achieving success in program integrity.
  5. Program integrity measures should be developed in a transparent manner that assures the opportunity for public input.
  6. There must be clear legal authority for any program integrity measure.
  7. A program integrity measure should not erect a barrier to appropriate care access.
  8. The least burdensome method of dealing with Medicare fraud and abuse is the best path to success.
  9. Any reforms or remedies should properly distinguish fraud from unintentional noncompliance.
  10. The outcome of the program integrity measures should be reliable with no “innocent victims” resulting.

NAHC concludes that the proposed changes meet most of these standards, but not all unless modifications are made for the Final Rule.

Provider Enrollment

NAHC describes the proposal as “a well-conceived and thoughtful reform of provider enrollment standards,” but offers that “it can be improved through a series of clarifications and enhanced structure.” NAHC states that, “[t]he breadth of the proposed requirements is so vast that stakeholders should have a clear understanding of individual and organizational obligations as the consequences would include the potential closure and destruction of a health care provider as Medicare and Medicaid participation and enrollment is often a core part of the operation. Decision-making subjectivity should be eliminated whenever possible to ensure consistent decision outcomes.”

The areas needing clarification include the definition of “overpayments,” the impact of appeal reversals on enrollment status, the application of enrollment sanctions on related providers stemming from voluntary terminations, and what is meant by “attempt to evade” the impact of an enrollment revocation through the opening of a new provider. Most importantly, NAHC seeks clarification of the standard that affects many of the CMS enrollment decisions under the proposal that a party knew or should have known of a discloseable event.

At the center of the CMS proposal is that the past history of a provider subject to enrollment sanction can follow individual owners and employees to other Medicare providers with the potential of an enrollment denial, revocation, or termination of the succeeding provider. CMS believes that there is a risk that if an individual owned a provider that was subject to enrollment termination that a later ownership or employment relationship with a different provider may create risk to Medicare. Similarly, CMS sees a risk even where the individual was a managing employee of the provider and moved to another unrelated provider.

In this regard, NAHC comments that, “[t]he provider enrollment proposals are highly complicated and leave too much room for subjective application… While factors are presented that a decision-maker can consider in rendering enrollment determinations, the lack of objective standards creates a high risk of inconsistent determinations on comparable facts.” NAHC recommends that CMS establish an objective decision matrix that applies impact weights on relevant factors to determine whether a past relationship creates such a risk to Medicare that enrollment should be denied.

With respect to enrollment standards, NAHC also recommends that CMS should require a separate, provider-specific justification to extend an enrollment bar from one related provider to another. Also, NAHC expresses concern that the proposal to impose enrollment revocation when CMS learns that a provider did not notify CMS within 30 days of a practice location change. NAHC recommends that a provider first be given the opportunity to correct its reporting. Finally, NAHC recommends that the “look-back” period relative to knowledge of past enrollment revocations be limited to 2-3 years rather than the 5 years under consideration.

Physician Enrollment in PECOS

The CMS proposal also includes the extension of a requirement that ordering, referring, and certifying physicians be enrolled in PECOS. This requirement has been limited to physicians certifying home health services until the recent expansion to Part D drugs. The proposal would extend it to all of Medicare providers and suppliers. NAHC comments explain that CMS has limited the home health services application to “”certifying” physicians and recommends that it not be expanded to include all ordering and referring physicians as such would exponentially increase the home health agency’s workload given the numbers of physicians implicated without improving program integrity.

Moratoria Application

 CMS proposes to amend the moratoria standards in two ways. First, CMS proposes to apply the moratoria only to providers who have submitted an application at the time the moratorium starts. NAHC strongly suggested such a standard to CMS when the original moratoria rules were promulgated. With the current rules, prospective providers that had invested significant funds and had a fully functioning home health agency were blocked from Medicare because they fell short of full approval at the time a moratorium took effect. NAHC’s comments note support for this proposed change.

In addition, CMS proposes to amend the rule to apply the moratoria block to providers that seek to relocate the geographic location of their office to inside the moratoria area. NAHC recommends that CMS modify that proposal and permit the provider to relocate within the moratoria area if its service area is unchanged. Currently, CMS views the office location as the determining factor rather than the provider’s service area.

The NAHC comments conclude with: “NAHC is a leader in the development and implementation of program integrity innovations. NAHC has long partnered with Medicare and other payers in rooting out the fraud, waste, and abuse through creative policy changes. The proposed provider enrollment standards are mostly proper and effective program integrity measures. Still, some modifications and clarifications of the proposals is need as discussed above. NAHC stands ready to work in partnership with CMS as this matter proceeds.” 

NAHC’s comments are available here.




©  National Association for Home Care & Hospice. All Rights Reserved.